• Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Inicio
  • NOSOTROS
  • SECTORES
    • ENERGÍA
      • Eléctrico
      • Petróleo y Gas
      • Renovables
    • Marítimo
    • INFRAESTRUCTURA
      • Puertos
      • Ductos
      • Carreteras
      • Edificios
      • Vías Férreas
      • Terminales de almacenamiento
  • SEGUROS
    • EMPRESAS
      • RESPONSABILIDAD CIVIL
        • Responsabilidad Ambiental
        • Responsabilidad Civil
        • Responsabilidad Civil Profesional
      • MARÍTIMO
        • Puertos y Terminales
        • Responsabilidad Civil Portuaria
        • Casco y P&I
        • Carga
        • Responsabilidad Civil del Fletador
      • DAÑOS
        • Daño Material
        • Múltiple Empresarial
        • Pérdida de Beneficios
      • CONSTRUCCIÓN
        • Construcción y Montaje
        • Obra Civil Terminada
      • MAQUINARIA Y EQUIPO
        • Equipo de Contratistas
      • EXPLORACIÓN Y EXTRACCIÓN
        • Control de Pozos
      • Aviación y Drones
      • Transporte
    • PERSONAS / BENEFICIOS
      • Vida Colectivo
      • Gastos Médicos Mayores Colectivo
      • Accidentes Personales
    • Hogar
    • AUTOS
      • Flotillas Autos y Camiones
      • Autos, Pickups y Camiones individuales
    • LINEAS FINANCIERAS
      • Cyber
      • Errores y Omisiones (E&O)
      • Directores D&O
      • Crime
  • FIANZAS
    • Licitación
    • Anticipo
    • Cumplimiento
    • Buena Calidad
    • Contingencias Laborales
    • Arrendamiento
    • Fiscales
    • Daños y Perjuicios
    • Fidelidad
    • Suministro Combustibles
    • Aduanales
  • BLOG
  • Noticias
  • CONTACTO
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Buscar
  • Menú Menú

Listado de la etiqueta: United States

Five reasons Development Banks hold the key to renewable energy investment boom

en

New Climate Economy report sets out how Multilateral Development Banks have a crucial role to play in mobilising clean energy investment

The New Climate Economy (NCE) group has this month published a major new report detailing the crucial role development banks need to play in ramping up clean energy investment in developing countries.

The coalition of 20 countries, chaired by former Mexican President Felipe Calderón and Lord Nicholas Stern, has previously said that investments in clean energy are one of the biggest steps that can be taken to close the so-called ‘emissions gap’.

By boosting investment to $1tr a year by 2030 yearly greenhouse emissions could be reduced by to 7.5 Gt CO2e, the new report said – an amount bigger than the annual emissions of the United States. Such deep emissions reductions would go a long way towards closing the gap between current projections and the level of emissions cuts needed to stand a reasonable chance of keeping global warming below 2C

However, the new report warns delivering a sharp increase in clean energy investment will require multilateral development banks (MDBs) to play an increasingly active role in supporting the mass deployment of renewable energy in emerging and developing economies.

     1.- Development banks are ideal catalysts for clean energy investment

Clean energy had a record year in 2015, attracting $329bn in global investment. However, this is still far short of what is needed both to limit global warming and provide energy access to the 1.1 billion people who still lack it.

MDBs can leverage up to 20 times the amount of money they invest, the report calculates, meaning a big boost in their spending would have a catalytic effect on private sector investment.

     2.- MDBs are well positioned to take on risks

While renewables are increasingly competitive in many developing markets with more investment now going into emerging markets than established ones, there are still risks that come with investment in these markets. Exchange rate risks, political risks and construction risk, all of which are higher than in OECD countries, are just some of the ways investors can be deterred from otherwise attractive clean energy projects.

However, since MDBs have a specific remit to promote development in the countries where they work, they are well positioned to take on the risks that other foreign investors may not be willing to shoulder. «They all have a public mandate to enable development globally, and from an energy perspective that is both scaling up energy and making it low carbon at the same time in the next 15 years,» Ilmi Granoff, co-author of the report and senior research associate and the Overseas Development Institute, tells BusinessGreen. «It’s making sure that those risks are addressed for clean energy, and relying on some of the older and new tools to scale up clean energy investments as the core of their energy strategy.»

     3.- Co-operation with other players is key

This doesn’t mean that development banks will be taking on all the responsibility alone – a key message from the New Climate Economy is how cooperation between MDBs, governments, and the private sector can allow new projects to be considered that may be too risky for one player to take on alone. Meanwhile, governments will also play an additional important role by scaling up the enabling role they can play in mobilising financing for clean energy, the report notes.

     4.-The money is there

A trillion dollars may sound like an awful lot, says Granoff, but there is no global shortage of global capital. Instead, the challenge is to shift incentives to ensure it is unleash in favour of clean energy.

The New Climate Economy group estimates that if low-cost, long-term financing were available for clean energy projects, the cost of clean electricity could be reduced by as much as 20 per cent in developed economies, and 30 per cent in emerging economies.

But in order to unlock this money, the financing system must be re-adjusted to take advantage of the benefits of renewables – their lack of fuel costs, lower operating costs, and flexibility in deployment – while also dealing with the challenges they bring, such as the need for higher grid investment.

«Clean energy is flexible and scalable, it has very low operating costs and often no fuel costs, so it has a bunch of really critical benefits,» says Granoff. «But it also functions differently: the upfront costs are greater, and so the project’s viability is more sensitive to financing costs than fossil fuel power investments. So there’s a bunch of enabling environment issues that have to happen in order to favour that clean energy framework.»

     5.- Fossil fuels will have to go

The flip side of the coin, of course, is that while moves are being made to promote and support clean energy, they must also be made to revamp an energy financing structure which until now has heavily benefited fossil fuels.

«It’s not simply about scaling up clean energy investment,» observes Granoff. «If we want the incentives to favour clean energy, we have to incentivising and stop subsidising through public financing high carbon energy systems. We need to be phasing out the financing of carbon energy systems, except in exceptional circumstances where there is an absolutely critical development rational without any viable alternative.

 

shutterstock_283450427

 

 

Font: Business Green
https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/shutterstock_2834504271-e1461003236926.jpg 134 200 admin https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg admin2026-05-11 19:30:372026-05-11 19:36:53Five reasons Development Banks hold the key to renewable energy investment boom

Trump Promises Business Leaders Major Border Tax, Rule Cuts

en

President Donald Trump told business leaders Monday he would impose a «very major» border tax on companies that move jobs outside the U.S. and said he would cut regulations by 75 percent.

A breakfast meeting with corporate executives at the White House kicked off the first working day of a president who made the promise of greater economic opportunity for American workers a centerpiece of his campaign. Trump plans to continue the theme Monday by signing executive orders on trade and labor issues, and will meet in the afternoon with labor leaders and U.S. workers, an administration official said.

The meeting, with an advisory panel on manufacturing led by Dow Chemical Co. Chief Executive Officer Andrew Liveris, welcomed some of the nation’s most prominent corporate leaders to the White House. During the transition, Trump at times used his new power as a cudgel against companies that provoked his ire with plans to move jobs overseas or with prices for weapons systems he considered excessive.

The president effusively praised the business leaders as «great people,» yet put them on notice that he was serious about the warnings about moving production overseas that he had issued during his campaign.

“If you go to another country” and cut U.S. jobs “we are going to be imposing a very major border tax” on that product, he told the executives.

Eye on Automakers

Among those in the room was Mark Fields, president and CEO of Ford Motor Co., which canceled plans to build a $1.6 billion plant in Mexico after Trump criticized the company during the campaign for plans to move small-car production from the U.S. to Mexico. Ford announced its plan to scrap the Mexico plant hours after Trump posted a tweet threatening to punish automaker General Motors Co. for building a factory in Mexico, though Ford said at the time its decision was unrelated.

No executive from General Motors was included in the breakfast meeting.

Trump mostly projected an optimistic tone Monday. “What we want to do is bring manufacturing back,” he said, highlighting tax-cut plans he said would rev up economic growth.

«We are going to be cutting taxes massively for both the middle class and for companies, and that’s massive,» Trump said.

He suggested that a roll-back of business regulations would be a particular focus of his economic plan, saying his observation has been that «regulation wins» over tax cuts as the more important factor in promoting growth.

Other business leaders at the morning meeting with Trump included Michael Dell, chairman and CEO of Dell Inc.; Jeff Fettig, chairman and CEO of Whirlpool Corp.; Alex Gorsky, chairman and CEO of Johnson & Johnson; Marillyn Hewson, chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp.; and Klaus Kleinfeld, chairman and CEO of Arconic Inc.

Also participating were Mario Longhi, president and CEO of United States Steel Corp.; Elon Musk, chairman and CEO of Tesla Motors Inc.; Kevin Plank, CEO and founder of Under Armour Inc.; Mark Sutton, chairman and CEO of International Paper Co.; and Wendell Weeks, chairman and CEO of Corning Inc.

BRITISH ECONOMY

 

Copyright: Bloomberg.

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/BRITISH-ECONOMY-e1485214801312.jpg 225 400 admin https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg admin2026-05-11 19:29:102026-05-11 19:37:08Trump Promises Business Leaders Major Border Tax, Rule Cuts

Mexico’s Pemex Jan crude output drops 10.6 pct from a year ago

en

Mexican national oil company Pemex produced 10.6 percent less crude oil in January than in the same month last year, the company said.

January crude output averaged 2.02 million barrels per day (bpd), down from 2.26 million bpd during the same month in 2016, according to company data released on Friday.

Meanwhile, crude oil exports were down 3 percent in January compared to the year-ago period.

Shipments for the month averaged nearly 1.09 million bpd, compared to 1.12 million bpd exported in January 2016.

About half of Mexico’s crude exports currently go to the United States.

The Mexican government is in the midst of implementing a sweeping energy reform finalized in 2014 that ended the decades-long production monopoly enjoyed by Pemex, formally known as Petroleos Mexicanos.

The reform also paved the way for first-ever oil auctions open to private and foreign producers, four of which were concluded last year. While a range of oil companies won the blocks on offer, significant streams of new output are not expected for at least several years.

Mexico’s oil regulator, the administrator of the auctions, is expected to oversee three auctions covering a mix of shallow water and onshore fields, in addition to a deep water auction over the course of this year.

Mexican crude output has declined over the past dozen years from a peak of 3.4 million barrels per day in 2014.

The government expects crude production to average 1.94 million bpd this year, and between 1.9 million to 2.0 million bpd in 2018.

mexico-economia

Reuters (Reporting by David Alire Garcia; Editing by David Gregorio) / Hellenic Shipping News

27/02/2017

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/mexico-economia-e1494297892126.jpg 267 400 admin https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg admin2026-05-11 19:29:072026-05-11 19:29:07Mexico’s Pemex Jan crude output drops 10.6 pct from a year ago

RBC boss says chances of NAFTA being scrapped are rising

en Mercados internacionales

FROM: Thomson Reuters / 9 de Enero de 2018

TORONTO — Royal Bank of Canada’s Chief Executive Dave McKay said on Tuesday he believes there is now a greater chance that the North American Free Trade Agreement could be scrapped.

“I think the probabilities are increasing that you’ll have some type of dynamic where there is an announcement of a scrapping of NAFTA,” he said at a Canadian Bank CEO conference hosted by RBC in Toronto.

Canadian bankers have expressed concern about the progress of talks to rework the trade agreement and how renegotiations could hamper the ability of clients to do business with customers in the United States and Mexico.

McKay said he agreed with other business leaders and the Canadian government that no deal would be better than a bad deal.

“We don’t want to be stuck long-term with a deal that hurts our economy,” he said.

McKay also said RBC, Canada’s biggest bank by market value, is now spending $3 billion a year developing new technologies. The bank is one of the biggest Canadian investors in technology such as artificial intelligence and blockchain and has increased the proportion of its technology spending on innovation compared with maintaining existing systems.

© Thomson Reuters 2018

royal mc

FROM: Thomson Reuters / 9 de Enero de 2018

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/royal-mc.jpg 400 600 admin https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg admin2026-05-11 19:27:022026-05-11 19:51:13RBC boss says chances of NAFTA being scrapped are rising

Mexico’s incoming government names ally from left to central bank

en Mercados internacionales

Reuters / Frank Jack Daniel / November 26

 

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – Mexico’s incoming finance minister on Monday nominated left-leaning economist Gerardo Esquivel as central bank deputy governor, the second appointment to the board by the new government following an independent named in September.

In a 2016 newspaper opinion piece, Harvard-educated Esquivel raised the question of whether the autonomous Banco de Mexico should adopt a dual-mandate to promote growth as well as low inflation, and argued for more diverse views on the board.

Esquivel was a spokesman on economic matters for the campaign of President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. He is married to Lopez Obrador’s choice for economy minister, Graciela Marquez, and was previously due to serve as a deputy finance minister in the cabinet.

Lopez Obrador, who secured a landslide election victory in July, takes office on Saturday.

In his profile on Twitter, Esquivel says “his heart beats to the left.” In 2015 he co-authored an Oxfam study titled “Extreme Inequality in Mexico” that explored the rapidly increasing wealth of Mexico’s small group of billionaires.

He did not immediately respond to an interview request for this story.

In a December 2016 column in Mexican daily El Universal, Esquivel strongly defended the bank’s independence, but suggested a debate about whether to change its objective.

“Maybe what we should start to ask ourselves is whether it is time to move to a dual objective (growth and inflation) in the central bank, instead of a single objective (inflation), in the same way as happens in other countries, like the United States,” he wrote.

He also cited an article in which he said economist Jonathan Heath argued for “a plurality of visions and perspectives about the economy” on the central bank’s five-strong board.

Incoming finance minister Carlos Urzua nominated Heath to the board in September, to replace a departing deputy governor. Esquivel is replacing another deputy, who is standing down on health grounds.

Incoming finance minister Carlos Urzua told Reuters earlier this year that the central bank should preserve its single objective.

Heath is an outspoken and well-known private economist who was previously chief economist for HSBC bank in Mexico. He told Reuters in September he had a “balanced” view on monetary policy. He has been critical of the outgoing government as well as some of Lopez Obrador’s policies.

Both nominations must be approved by the Senate, which is controlled by Lopez Obrador’s MORENA party and its allies.

Urzua announced the appointment in a news conference aimed at calming investors, after Mexico’s S&P/BVM IPC stock index .MXXcrashed to its lowest in more than four years on Monday and the peso weakened.

Urzua later told Reuters he would name Victoria Rodriguez Ceja, another close ally who previously worked with him in Mexico City’s local government, to replace Esquivel.

The losses to the index and the peso MXN=, which slipped to its weakest against the dollar in more than five months on Monday, come after Lopez Obrador announced he would stop the construction of a $13 billion airport and after a series of bills from his party aimed at regulating business more closely.

 

Reuters / Frank Jack Daniel / November 26

 

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WhatsApp-Image-2018-11-27-at-17.26.44.jpeg 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-11-27 17:40:582026-05-11 19:51:14Mexico’s incoming government names ally from left to central bank

Will Mexico’s New President Have An Economic Impact on RGV?

en Mercados internacionales

KVEO / Joanna Guzman / 12 November

 

MCALLEN, Texas – Mexico’s president-elect, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, plans on canceling the construction of a $13 billion airport project in Mexico City. Officials say this will have an economic impact for both the United States and Mexico.

Duncan Wood, Director for Wilson Center-Mexico Institute says, «We’re seeing that the United States has invested very heavily in Mexico over the past 20 years, since the signing of NAFTA. Mexico is investing increasingly north of the border as well. we see integrated production chains that have been created where by factories in the United States depend upon the input counterparts in Mexico and vice-versa.»

With more than 1.5 million Americans living in Mexico, Woods says the U.S. and Mexico share over $2 million in goods traded every hour. Adding the Rio Grande Valley is a part of the Untied States that depends heavily on the trade between the two countries.

Wood says, «In a place like McAllen which is depending so heavily upon Mexican’s coming north to do their shopping, issues like the border, how easily you can get across the border. Issues like public security in northern Mexico, Mexican’s are more willingly to take the journey from let’s say Monterrey into McAllen to do their shopping. Those are issues which really matter and will have a very important economic impact on these communities.”

One-third of the new international airport in Mexico City is already finished. It is estimated the cost to cancel the project is nearly $5 billion. Lopez Obrador says the country has money set aside for. Meanwhile, Woods says the focus right now is on what the future holds.

«We’re trying to work out exactly what the prospects are for the economy, for security; public security in particular, for migration, and of course the energy sector which matters so much down here in McAllen.» says Wood.

Lopez Obrador says the airport project is corrupt and will end ties between economic and political power. Lopez Obrador will take office on December 1.

 

KVEO / Joanna Guzman / 12 November

 

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Will-Mexicos-New-President-Have-An-Economic-Impact.png 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-11-13 13:24:552026-05-11 19:51:15Will Mexico’s New President Have An Economic Impact on RGV?

Mexico, Canada play hardball on trade deal over steel tariffs

en Mercados internacionales

Washington Examiner / Sean Higgins / October 26

 

Juan Carlos Baker, Mexico’s deputy commerce minister, said Friday that his government may not sign the final text of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade if the U.S. does not agree to provide exemptions to its tariffs on steel and aluminum.

The Trump administration is balking at that demand, however, as its counter-proposal, a quota system, is getting the cold shoulder from both Mexico and Canada, which is also seeking an exemption from the tariffs.

“We believe we need to solve that issue before the signing takes place,” Baker told reporters in Ottawa. The signing has been tentatively set for the end of November.

It was the toughest threat yet from one of the negotiators over the deal that would replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Mexico and Canada have lobbied the U.S. to lift exemptions to the tariffs, 25 percent for steel and 10 percent for aluminum, arguing that now that the talks for the USMCA deal are complete, there’s no need to maintain those tariffs.

The U.S. however has resisted providing the exemptions, fearing that doing so would allow China, the main target of the tariffs, to harm the U.S. steel industry.

«The president is reviewing the steel and aluminum tariffs,” said Kelly Craft, U.S. ambassador to Canada, Friday at a forum hosted by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce. «That is not something that is against Canada … It’s just protecting North America from other countries that will be passing raw materials through, and also to protect our steel industry at home.»

The White House initially carved out exceptions for Canada and Mexico to its steel and aluminum tariffs , then revoked them in June as a way to pressure both countries during the talks to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The U.S. has proposed replacing the tariffs with a quota system, similar to what it did for South Korea regarding steel, when in August it allowed a quota of 70 percent of average steel exports to the United States in the years 2015 to 2017. Neither Canada nor Mexico are expressing interest on that, according to an administration official who requested anonymity to discuss ongoing talks. As a consequence, there isn’t much talk going on between the countries to resolve the tariff issue, the official said.

A Canadian government official, speaking anonymously, told the CBC earlier this week, that a quota proposal was a concession that Canada would make. Officials see no reason why they cannot return to status quo on metal imports from before the NAFTA talks. “There is no need for those tariffs to be in place,» Canadian Ambassador David MacNaughton said Friday in Ottawa.

Backers of the administration’s policies say a quota is still the best compromise for all sides. «From a U.S. industry perspective, tariffs are similarly effective to quotas if done right,» said Michael Stumo, chief executive officer of the business-labor Coalition for a Prosperous America. «From Canada’s perspective, they should want quotas rather than tariffs because with a quota, their industry gets the money, but with a tariff, the U.S. government gets the money.»

Critics charge that the systems lead to cronyism. «They empower foreign governments to pick winners and losers by deciding which steel or aluminum companies are allocated part of each country’s quota to export to the United States,» said Bryan Riley, trade policy analyst for the National Taxpayers Union. «That’s one reason quotas may be harder to get rid of than tariffs — they can create a political constituency in foreign countries in support of the quotas.»

Hugo Perezcano Diaz, deputy director of the international law research program at Canada’s Centre for International Governance Innovation and a former NAFTA negotiator, speculates that the quota talk may be leading to an alternate solution, a closed three-country market. «Canada has already adopted a safeguard against imports of steel products from the rest of the world, including Mexico,» he said. «If Mexico were to do something similar and the three countries close the North American market, the U.S. may feel sufficiently protected to eliminate the tariffs.»

 

Washington Examiner / Sean Higgins / October 26

 

 

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Mexico-Canada-play-hardball.png 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-10-30 17:32:182026-05-11 19:51:15Mexico, Canada play hardball on trade deal over steel tariffs

Unfinished business: Putting the final touches on the USMCA

en Mercados internacionales, Reforma energética de México

The Hill /  David L. Goldwyn / October 29

 

The proposed US Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) makes important, but incomplete, progress in securing an integrated North American energy market.

In terms of progress, the agreement preserves zero tariffs for trade in oil, gas and petroleum products across North America. It effectively locks in Mexico’s historic energy reforms by ensuring that Mexico cannot reinstate restrictions on US investment in the oil and gas sector. A “ratchet” clause ensures that if Mexico decides to further liberalize the sector, then that higher floor becomes the new USMCA commitment.

While Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms are weaker, they remain in force for certain “covered sectors,” including oil and gas investments in Mexico and power generation and pipeline investments where the investor has a contract with the government.

These are all positive steps for North American energy security. Mexico and Canada provide the United States with the heavy grades of oil not produced domestically, helping US refineries produce gasoline at the lowest possible cost. Thanks to this relationship,  the United States is an efficient net exporter of petroleum products.

However, while this progress is laudable, it remains incomplete.

In the rush to conclude the agreement, effective protection for power generation investments like new wind and solar plants, refining and natural gas infrastructure, and power transmission lines were left out, perhaps inadvertently. Contracts for these investments are with state owned enterprises (SOEs) like Mexico’s CFE and PEMEX, which do not now fall within the definition of “federal government” because they are not disposing of assets but signing a contract for service. These essential investments, in the gas and refined product infrastructure which carry US products to and through Mexico, transmission lines which carry US electricity south, and investments in power generation are not permitted to bring ISDS claims to enforce their rights.

This is an oversight, and a protection these investments should enjoy. Rather, the proposed agreement creates an uneven playing field as investors who do have a contract with the Federal government, say for exploration, are entitled to bring an ISDS claim for any of their businesses, while those who do not have such contract do not. The problem can be easily fixed by expanding the definition of federal government to include these wholly owned SOEs.

These (for now) unprotected investments are critical to North American energy security. They secure US exports of electricity and natural gas and assure the continued reliability of the North American electricity system. They are the lifelines which carry US exports to Mexico – currently our number one customer for natural gas and petroleum products.

Protecting investments in Mexico’s electricity sector improves US national security by supporting Mexico’s prosperity through a more resilient power system.

Finally, if US power sector investments in Mexico are not protected and thus potentially hindered or lost, China is certain to fill the gap.

Chinese investment in all forms of power generation, transmission, and distribution is rapidly accelerating throughout Latin America. According to a recent Atlantic Council report, cumulative flows of Chinese foreign direct investment in Latin America have reached $110 billion, with $25 billion in oil and gas investment, and $13 billion in electricity, utilities and alternative energy. China’s State Grid has invested $7 billion in Brazil, through a combination of greenfield investments and acquisitions.

If the Mexican government is willing to offer these investments protections (and they are), and create a level playing field for American companies investing in our closest neighbor, the US should not object.

Fortunately, there is still time to correct the definition of eligible claimants as both sides ready the agreement for ratification.  With these modest steps, the United States, Mexico and Canada can improve the resilience of North America’s energy system, and the US can simultaneously advance its economic and national security interests.

David L. Goldwyn is president of Goldwyn Global Strategies, an international energy advisory consultancy and serves as chairman of the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center Energy Advisory Group. He served as the U.S. State Department’s special envoy and coordinator for international energy affairs from 2009 to 2011; he previously served as assistant secretary of energy for international affairs and as national security deputy to U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Bill Richardson. He is a member of the U.S. National Petroleum Council and the Council on Foreign Relations.

 

The Hill /  David L. Goldwyn / October 29

 

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Putting-the-final-touches-on-the-USMCA.png 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-10-30 17:20:122026-05-11 19:51:15Unfinished business: Putting the final touches on the USMCA

How President Trump’s Trade Deals Could Lift the US Economy

en Mercados internacionales

Market Realist / Mark O’Hara / October 8

Trade deals

President Donald Trump has long lashed out against existing trade deals, calling them unfair to the United States. The Trump administration has been working to renegotiate several trade deals, and the focus has been on reducing the country’s massive trade deficit by moving its manufacturing onshore.

UMSCA

The Trump administration has used tariffs as well as tariff threats to obtain trade concessions. Less than halfway into his presidential term, Trump has renegotiated NAFTA and KORUS FTA (the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement).

Under the new NAFTA—renamed USMCA (the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement)—the United States is expected to gain access to Canada’s historically protected dairy industry. It also calls for more regional content in automotive manufacturing.

Under the new KORUS terms, South Korea relaxed the norms for automotive imports from the United States. It also agreed to a quota to obtain long-term exemptions from the Section 232 steel tariffs in the United States (QQQ).

Section 232 tariffs

Trump’s trade rhetoric has received support as well as opposition. Retail and tech giants such as Walmart (WMT), Alphabet (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), and Amazon (AMZN) are lobbying against these tariffs. However, the new trade deals have allowed the Trump administration to obtain incremental benefits that are expected to support US jobs. We’ve seen plant restarts in the US steel and aluminum industry after the Section 232 tariffs were implemented.

 

Market Realist / Mark O’Hara / October 8

 

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/President-Trump’s-Trade-Deals.png 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-10-10 13:59:142026-05-11 19:51:16How President Trump’s Trade Deals Could Lift the US Economy

The economic relationship between Mexico and the United States

en Mercados internacionales

FROM: Oup Blog / Roderic Al Camp / 17 de febrero de 2018

Mexico and the United States share a highly integrated economic relationship. There seems to be an assumption among many Americans, including officials in the current administration, that the relationship is somehow one-sided, that is, that Mexico is the sole beneficiary of commerce between the two countries. Yet, economic benefits to both countries are extensive.

Mexico has played a significant role in the rapid expansion of US exports in the 1990s and 2000s. It alternated between the second and third most important trade partner of the United States in the last decade. In 2014, the United States exported a total of $240 billion worth of goods to Mexico, with the largest  products coming from the computers and electronics, transportation, petroleum, and machinery sectors. By contrast, China only purchased $124 billion of US exports. Exports to Mexico accounted for approximately 1,344,000 jobs in the United States.

California alone, boasting the eighth largest economy in the world, exported more than 15% of its products to Mexico by 2014, exceeding what it trades with Canada, Japan, or China. As of 2014, Mexico’s purchases of California exports supported nearly 200,000 jobs in the state. In fact, 17% of all export-supported jobs in California, which account for a fifth of all individuals employed in the state, are linked to the state’s economic relationship with Mexico. More than half of those export-related positions can be traced to the North American Free Trade Agreement. California and Texas – the two largest economies in the United States, and two of the three largest state/provincial economies in the world – are significantly influenced economically by Mexico.

In 2014, a heavy portion of exports from six US states were purchased by Mexico: 41% in Arizona, 41% in New Mexico, 36% in Texas, 25% in New Hampshire, 23% in South Dakota, and 23% in Nebraska. As Senator John McCain noted several weeks ago, the Trump administration’s decision to renegotiate, rather than withdraw from NAFTA, prevented a horrific economic impact on Arizona. The GDP of the United States and Mexican border states accounts for a fourth of the national economy of both countries combined, exceeding the GDP of all the countries in the world except for the United States, Japan, China, and Germany.

The United States provides the single largest amount of direct foreign investment in Mexico, but what I want to stress, and to educate Americans about, is that Mexican entrepreneurs and venture capitalists invest heavily in the United Sates. By 2013, Mexico had invested $33 billion, the only emerging economy among the top fifteen countries with direct foreign investments in the United States. In 2015, Pemex, the government oil company, opened the first retail gasoline station in the United States, in Houston, and plans on opening four more in that city. This is a pilot project to test the American market nationally. OXXO, another Mexican firm, has opened two convenience stores in Texas, and plans on investing $850 million to open 900 stores in the United States.

Finally, Mexico also influences the US economy through tourism in the same way that American tourists play a central role in Mexico’s economy. In 2014, 75 million foreigners visited the United States, generating $221 billion dollars. Canada accounts for the largest number of visitors each year, followed by Mexico, which provided 17 million tourists in 2014, who spent $19 billion. Along the border, at the end of the decade, Mexican visitors generated somewhere around $8 billion to $9 billion dollars in sales and supported approximately 150,000 jobs.

Another way to look at the relationship between Mexico and the United States is through cultural influences.  Mexico exerts impact through music, food, film, and language. For example, there are multiple fast-food chains that spe­cialize in Mexican food. Grocery stores stock more items originating from Mexico than any other ethnic cuisine in the world, including beers, beans, hot sauces, peppers, and torti­llas. Corona is the best-selling foreign beer in the United States. Mexican foods such as guacamole and caesar salad are so com­monplace that they have lost their identity as Mexican cuisine.

The use of Spanish words and Mexican slang is evident in ev­eryday language in the United States; such terms range from “mano a mano” to “macho,” “enchilada” to “margarita,” and “rancho” to “hacienda.” According to a Pew Center study in 2011, 38 million individuals in the United States five years or older showed that the majority of them were Mexican, and were speaking Spanish at home. Spanish is also the most widely spoken non-English language among Americans who are not from a Hispanic country. The size of the Spanish-speaking audience in the United States has also influenced the growth of Mexican films. The musical influence has kept pace with cuisine. In 2010, the New Yorker magazine ran an extensive article about Los Tigres del Norte, a musical group from San Jose, California, who represent the norteño musical style. They boast a huge following among music fans. Selena, who died two decades ago, has sold more than 60 million albums, including songs representing the mariachi and ranch­era genres, and the number of copies of her posthumous best-selling album of all time, Dreaming of You, reached five million by 2015. Among young adults (18 to 34 years of age) who listen to the radio, Mexican regional music ranks seventh in popularity.

The relationship between the United States and Mexico has become more complex over time, incorporating cultural, musical, economic, familial, political, and security relationships beneficial to both countries and its citizens. But the most dramatic change in those many facets of our relationship with each other is the degree to which Mexico’s impact on and within the United States has grown in importance. Equally important to consider is that in spite of President Trump’s public criticisms of Mexico, our relationship at numerous levels, public and private, remains strong.

 

 

FROM: Oup Blog / Roderic Al Camp / 17 de febrero de 2018

https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/chocmc.jpg 400 600 Soporte https://nrgibroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/logo-nrgi.svg Soporte2018-02-20 12:18:402026-05-11 19:51:24The economic relationship between Mexico and the United States
Página 1 de 212

Buscador

Search Search

Categorías

  • Mexicanas Mujeres (14)
  • Mujeres (14)
  • Mujeres Exitosas (15)

Entradas Recientes

  • Rompiendo Barreras. Construyendo el Futuro
  • El Poder Femenino de la Perspicacia en el Mundo Empresarial Mexicano
  • La Secretaría de Marina reconoce a Graciela Alvarez Hoth en el día Internacional de la Mujer en el Sector Marítimo
  • Graciela Álvarez reconocida como una de las pioneras en la industria energética por la revista Oil and Gas Magazine
  • NRGI Broker Presente en el Congreso Mexicano de Petróleo 2022

NRGI Broker

Somos el enlace entre los riesgos que enfrentan las industrias del sector energético con las soluciones para administrarlos y respaldarlos mediante esquemas confiables de garantías financieras.

Contáctanos

Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 1015 Torre A Piso 21. Col. Desarrollo Santa Fe, Contadero, C.P. 05348 CDMX, México

Tel: +52 (55) 9177 2100

Horario de Atención

Lunes – Viernes: 7:30-18:00
Contáctanos: [email protected]

© Copyright - NRGI Broker | Aviso de Privacidad | Términos y condiciones
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba Desplazarse hacia arriba